![]() |
||||
| 4th Global Conference
Wednesday 12th July - Friday 14th July 2006
|
||||
Session 7B: Moments of Death and Interventions
at the End of Life
Withholding
and withdrawing life saving medical treatment (LSMT) are common
medical practice in European Hospitals. Recent data from the Netherlands
and Belgium suggests that nearly 40 % of all deaths are due to Medical
Decisions Concerning the End of Life (MDELs), including physician-assisted
death (euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide), alleviation of symptoms
with possible life-shortening effect, and non-treatment decisions. For
example, although in 2001 less than 3% of all deaths in the Netherlands
are
the result of euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide academic and
public
discourse focus on the moral permissibility of both of them, neglecting
the
problem of withholding and withdrawing treatment. In comparison with
practices of physician-assisted death, non-treatment decisions are less
often regulated, overtly discussed or subject matter of academic and
public
discussion. The frequency of non-treatment decisions change due to old
age
- the elder the patient the more often such decisions are made. These
descriptive results are to be in need of serious consideration especially
against the background of increasing withholding and withdrawing nutrition
and fluid in elderly demented patients. Death and the Maiden: End-of-life Policy
in the USA: The Interplay of Technology and the Iconography of the
Female Body Medical technology enables the extension
of the dying process in coma and persistent vegetative states, where
patients are kept alive by drugs and mechanical devices. These technological
possibilities have provoked debate over a legal definition of death,
the circumstances in which treatment should be withdrawn and the grounds
on which such decisions might be justified. These controversies have
usually been analysed in terms of doctors’ fears of liability,
concerns over the sanctity of life and the need for viable organs for
transplantation. Contemporary Constructions of the
'Moment of Death' The ‘moment of death’, once a dominant concept
in relation to preparing for a ‘good death’, has been eclipsed
by a focus on the wider concept of the ‘dying trajectory’.
An individual’s
dying moments have become merely the end point of a complex and uncertain
process that has been constructed as either the ‘medical bad death’ or
what ought to be our ‘final stage of growth’ (Kubler-Ross,
1979). This reflects changing belief systems and practices, in which
a secular, medicalised management of dying has replaced the traditional
deathbed preparations or ars moriendi designed to ensure the soul’s
safe passage to the afterlife. In a medicalised, institutionalised system
of dying the family’s presence at the deathbed may not always be
practical or possible. Dying trajectories are uncertain, hospital schedules
must be negotiated and people may live at a distance. |
||||
|
© Inter-Disciplinary.Net 2006 |
||||