4th Global Conference

home Archives Making Sense Of:

Monday 4th July - Thursday 7th July 2005
Mansfield College, Oxford

Conference Programme, Abstracts & Papers

 


Session 12: Writing the Experience of Illness (2)
Chair: Charlotte Baker

"Beyond Description"- Seventeenth-Century Representations of Breast Cancer
Thérèse Taylor
School of Humanities, Charles Sturt University, New South Wales, Australia

Breast cancer has a long history, and a status as a ‘hidden disease’, which usually caused the sufferers to retreat to the female world of domestic space. 
In 1666, breast cancer claimed a high profile victim.  Anne of Austria, queen of France, died in the Louvre after a lengthy and public illness.  She endured the disease, and also attempts to cure it, which included surgery.  Anne’s status as a queen caused her death to be an event in which many people participated, and had the opportunity to record their impressions.  In her case, the barriers which kept women’s cancers hidden did not apply.  The documents generated by her illness give an opportunity to understand something of the history of this disease.
In this paper, I explain how Anne’s illness affected those around her, and the ways that breast cancer had physical and symbolic meanings.  My argument is that her death had an unusual degree of impact.  Her sufferings were difficult to represent or explain, although the culture of the time was habituated to the sight of death and disease.  Anne’s death was a trauma which her household recovered from only slowly.    


Metaphors of Injury: Making Sense of Visceral Pelvic Pain
Victoria M. Grace and Sara MacBride-Stewart
Social Sciences, College of Arts, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand

Generating an understanding of chronic visceral pain in the pelvis is the single most important aspect for women in the ir experience of ‘chronic pelvic pain’. Not-withstanding the long history of hysteria which attributed the origin of women’s apparently unspecifiable yet numerous ailments, pains, paralyses and fatigues to disturbances in this symbolic site, biomedical knowledge is lauded for having replaced cultural ‘mythologies’ with the explanatory discourse of biological ‘science’. Chronic pelvic pain, however, frequently resists or frustrates the attempts of a biomedical paradigm to provide satisfactory explanations. Given the ‘unexplained’ character of chronic pelvic pain for many women, how do the y generate understandings of the ir pain? What discursive patterns feature in the ir narratives specifically in relation to making sense of the interior of the pelvis? Why is an ‘understanding’ important, and what does this mean? How is gender ‘read’ into meanings of the pelvis-in-pain?
This paper analyses the narratives of forty New Zealand women of European descent who have or have had chronic pelvic pain that is not associated with menstruation or sexual activity. Many also have pain with periods, and/or pain with penetrative sexual activity. Open-ended interviews aimed to generate narratives conveying the meanings of pain through a conversational exploratory method. The specific focus for this analysis is on talk about meanings associated with the physicality of the pelvis-in-pain.
The binary ontology of the post-Enlightenment West that constitutes the body simultaneously as the object of an empirical (biomedical) science and as the lived experience of a subject, dislocates embodiment, and splits explanation from experience. This paper explores how women make sense of the ir pain both within and against this subject/object binary; how imaginary (and digital) visualisation of the ‘workings’ of the pelvic interior are crucial for many women as a sort of boundary-marking that possibly confines the pain; and how metaphors of injury create an intelligibility of painful processes that helps to anchor women-in-pain within a meaningful world of o the rs.


Perceptions of Pain in Contemporary Zimbawean literature - Personal and Public Narratives in Yvonne Vera's The Stone Virgins
Zoe Norridge
SOAS, London, United Kingdom

Human suffering has long been a dominant representative theme of African literature. Consequently, bearing witness to the disabling violence of the colonial project and giving voices to the powerless in pain is a key feature of both nationalist and feminist literary theoretical approaches. Rather than focussing solely on witnessing the infliction of bodily pain, contemporary writers are also exploring the possibilities of living with unforgettable pain. Zimbabwean novelist Yvonne Vera is one such writer.
Vera’s acclaimed 2002 novel, The Stone Virgins tells the story of two sisters who are attacked by a dissident in the early years of independence. The attacker beheads one of the sisters and cuts the lips off the other. The narrative surrounding this incident is an exploration of the social currency of the body and strategies for survival in a physically uncertain world.
This paper investigates how such extreme experiences are described through innovative use of both language and temporal structures. Bodies, in health and in sickness, are figured throughout the text, and the recurring motif of exposed bones works to dissolve the barriers between the internal organs and social surface of the body. These bodies also interact with the historical contexts of colonialism, guerrilla war and continued violence post-independence. Yet Vera’s text remains morally ambiguous towards this politicisation of the personal.
As a Zimbabwean woman from Bulawayo, Vera the writer is located within a similar geographical and temporal framework to her heroine. So finally I will ask whether the writer of such pain is also implicated in her project. Are the traumatic elements of the text a deliberate narrative strategy or is the storyteller also sick? And if the writer of pain is indeed also in pain, then what are the implications for the work’s readership and literary theory? Understanding these questions will help us begin to make sense of pain narratives in contemporary African fiction.

Download Conference Paper -