![]() |
|||||||
4th Global Conference
|
|||||||
Monday 4th July - Thursday 7th July 2005 Conference Programme, Abstracts & Papers
|
|||||||
|
A Body Worth Defending: “Immunity” and
the Bio-Politics of Bio-Medicine This paper explores why, at the end of the 19th century, a 2000 year old juridico-political concept, “immunity,” could be used to describe a newly identified organismic function, “self defense,” a concept which itself has a significant juridical and political history. My basic questions are: how did it begin to make sense in the 1880s and 1890s to imagine that fundamental organismic activities could be described in terms of legal and political frameworks and what consequences has this importation of politics and law into bio-science had for the practice, politics and ethics of health care. This paper argues that immunity's apotheosis as a bio-medical truth incorporated a complex set of political assumptions about personhood and collectivity, about nature and culture, about illness and health, which then got naturalized as forms of explanation though the unreflective mapping of law and politics into the human body itself. A work of genealogical inquiry, the paper seeks to elucidate this complexity by unpacking and elaborating the some of concepts and assumptions on which the biological appropriation of immunity leans. It tries to understand what made the politico-juridco-medico hybrid “immunity” not just thinkable, but indeed the basis for a profound reimagination of human-ness per se. A concluding meditation on the politics of AIDS opens the questions that the paper asks outward to the current moment in which once again the political effects of an incurable infectious disease have rendered the bio-politics of the bio-medical imagination palpable. In sum, the paper's primary aim is to make us more aware of the ways that bio-medicine functions not only as a curative research project but also as a politics and an ethics by other means. Recruitment of African Nurses in the UK The international recruitment of nurses is a major
issue, with health, public policy and ethical ramifications. The 2001
United Kingdom Code of Practice on International Recruitment of Nurses
prohibited the active recruitment of nurses from developing countries
with nursing shortages of their own. Studies commissioned by the Royal
College of Nursing indicate that the United Kingdom continues to recruit
nurses from Africa . Private agencies and individual contacts have become
more common methods of recruitment. Unlike the NHS, the Code of Practice
does not cover private agencies. Africa ’s loss of nurses is problematic,
especially now, when the greatest social and economic burden facing sub-Saharan
Africa , HIV-AIDS, has increased the need for nurses. |
|||||||