Session 4b: Explanatory Models
Chair: Gretchen Dobrott
Sense and Sensibility’ - Medical Pluralism
in Postsocialist Croatia
Tanja
Bukovcan
Department of Ethnology and Cultural
Anthropology, Faculty of Humanities and Social
Sciences, University of Zagreb, Croatia
In the presentation I will outline my PhD research,
the main topic of which was medical pluralism in postsocialist Croatia.
The research deals with interrelatedness and co-existence of biomedical
and non-biomedical systems in the city of Zagreb,
the capital of Croatia.
The staring point of my research were the patients, their attitudes
towards illness and health and their reasons for the selection of specific
therapies, healers and/or medical systems, as well as the factors (cultural,
social, generational, educational, religious, political-ideological,
financial) which determined their choice.
The postsocialist period in Croatia started
in the 1990ies and, among other changes, brought about significant
changes to the biomedical health care system, which became less state
funded and much more market oriented and, as the consequence, more
expensive to the end-users, the patients. Simultaneously, and maybe
partly because of this, the non-biomedical systems were more ‘loud’ and
more visible, ranging from folk healers, herbalists, through exorcists,
bioenergy practitioners to ayurveda or acupuncture.
My research findings were the following: for the
majority of the people I interviewed biomedicine came first, but in
case of chronic, terminal or psychosomatic illnesses, they sought alternative
therapies ranging from folk healers to established non-Western medical
systems.
As an ethnographer, I was faced with
moving stories of loss and trauma (stories of war refugees, patients
with PTSS, disabled people), as well as stories of miraculous healings
and becoming well again (‘feeling like being born again’) which made me re-examine
my position of observer, interpreter and analyst. Anthropology’s
unique possibility of understanding and interpreting other cultural
norms and relams and its application to this very sensitive field full
of emotional attitudes, opinions, beliefs, metaphors and meanings may,
in the case of applied medical anthropology, suggest a possible shift
towards acitivism.
Indignation in a Cross-cultural Clinical Context
Nathalie
Dinh
Université de Montréal, Département
de Psychologie and
Culture & Mental Health Research Unit, Sir Mortimer B. Davis - Jewish
General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Culture is an essential variable
of diagnosis and treatment. A cultural perspective draws attention to
the social context within which symptoms arise, are given meaning, and
are managed. Ethno-cultural work on illness narratives suggests that
most people can provide culturally-based explanations for their symptoms.
While these explanations are inconsistent with biomedical theory, they
relieve patient distress by allowing the patient to create meaning for
symptoms. Exploring the characteristics, context, and antecedents of
the symptoms enables the patient to convey them to the clinician who
may have a divergent explanation of sickness. This case study uses the
Cultural Formulation Guidelines of the DSM-IV created for clinicians
to elicit a narrative account of the illness experience from the patient.
It examines how the patient, a Laotian, diagnosed with post-traumatic
stress disorder, used social indignation (“kwam khem keuang”)
as an explanatory model after he underwent a traumatic amputation. In
explaining his illness through a cultural idiom, the patient was able
to reveal both personal meaning of repressed anger and frustration, expressing
them in a cultural context that was acceptable to him. This cultural
idiom, allowed the patient to reflect upon the structure of the health
care system and the specific context in which symptoms and their possible
origins are recounted and explored. It also clarified to the treating
clinicians some categories of experience and causal explanations that
did not fit easily with western biomedical and psychiatric understanding.
The case study illustrates how a cultural approach to illness from the
patient’s perspective offers a reflexive stance on the clinician-patient
interaction that allows for better patient care.
Download Conference Paper - 
Explanatory Models of Mental Illness in Urban Tanzania
Samrad
Ghane
Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam,
The Netherlands
“Explanatory models of illness” are perceived
as core components of illness experience. These models offer explanations
of illness and suffering, and hence construct personal and social meaning
for the experience of illness.
The interaction between the illness beliefs of patients and practitioners
is thought to be a fundamental factor in (mental) health care. Changes
in popular views on illness and healing, following contact with biomedical
knowledge and practices, do not necessarily involve the accommodation of
professional beliefs. On the contrary, patients may transform, reinterpret
and subsequently integrate elements of professional models in previously
held systems of thoughts. So far, only a few studies have incorporated
a prospective method, allowing a direct observation of belief changes,
and none has carried out an in-depth analysis of these changes among
patients, diagnosed with a mental disorder.
This paper draws
upon an ethnographic fieldwork in a psychiatric hospital in Tanzania,
aimed at understanding changes in explanatory models of mental illness
among individuals who sought (western-oriented) psychiatric treatment.
In taking
a critical approach towards the original concept of “explanatory
models”, the paper will, firstly, discuss methods, through which
patients constructed and altered their models and narratives. Secondly,
attention will be given to the professional views on illness causation,
and the way they affected the diagnostic and treatment decisions. Finally,
the interaction between the professional and lay explanations of illness
will be described within the context of a Dr/patient relationship, marked
by hierarchy and power inequality.
|