![]() |
||||||
6th Global Conference
Monday 2nd July - Thursday 5th
July 2007 |
||||||
| Session 3: Pedagogy, Citizenship and Conflict Ecocomposition Pedagogy: The Environmental Imperative for L’écriture
Féminine The essentially untapped discipline of “ecocomposition,” a
term coined by composition theorists Sidney I. Dobrin and Christian R.
Weisser, offers unlimited
theoretical potential for addressing issues of environmental urgency
through the forum of the college composition classroom. Broaching the
topic of global environmental crisis in the writing classroom usually
takes the shape of assigning texts that encourage environmental literacy
through a content-based approach. However, the foundational tenets of “ecocomposition” insist
on a paradigm shift in the way that we perceive of the transmission of
ecological ethics and knowledge. Dobrin and Weisser claim that the act
of writing must be perceived as an ecological act in and of itself, what
they call the practice of “discursive ecology.” This theory
encourages students to “explore writing and writing processes as
systems of interaction, economy, and interconnectedness” (116). Building Citizenship on Environmental Local Problems in Mexico National University, CRIM, UNAM, Mexico The purpose
of this research is to describe how schooling, media and an active citizenship
contribute to people’s understanding of their
local environment problems and to the start up of initiatives that contribute
to the region’s sustainable development, Morelos, southern neighbour
state of Mexico city. We asked ourselves three questions: How knowledge
and social context contribute to their environment’s local problems
understanding? How do they use such knowledge to define their own
responsibility as well as its government’s about environment problems? How
do they use their cultural, social and symbolic capital to discuss and
take on their responsibilities of doing something about their local environment
problems? Understanding Rural Community Conflict Using
Network Analysis: A Case Study of a Proposed Coal-Fired Power
Plant in the Southwestern United States China, India, and the United States by 2012 are expected to emit 2.7 billion additional tons of carbon dioxide from coal-fired power plants. The U.S. is considering building about 150 plants that are controversial because of greenhouse-gas emissions and environmental toxins. This paper is based upon a case study of a rural South-western U.S. homogeneous community in which a proposed coal-fired power plant is creating community conflict over economic, health, environmental, and quality of life issues. The study was initiated because of a recent oil strike in the community; however, it soon became apparent that the plant siting was the major focus of controversy rather than the oil strike. We conducted 31 interviews using network mapping, analyzing network structures that were focused on the power plant controversy. In the interviews, the respondents discussed their perceptions of economic development. Two fairly distinct social network cliques were identified with little interaction taking place between them. One was largely supportive of the plant, while the other was largely opposed. Within each clique, there were some who were opposed mainly to the plant location. We present qualitative data that identify the different types of reasoning behind the respondents’ support or non-support of the power plant. In addition, an indication of public positions on the issue is presented. Theoretical issues involving NIMBY (not-in-my-backyard) are discussed in light of the complexity of the responses identified in this case study. Important environmental justice implications are discussed regarding groups and decision-making. Unlike many environmental justice studies, the major players in this conflict are represented by powerful individuals within the community. Mapping these network structures and identifying the major reasons for support or non-support of the coal-fired power plant may point to an emerging pattern of community responses to such environmental issues. |
||||||
©2007 Inter-Disciplinary.Net |
||||||