![]() |
|
|
|
|
| Session 10: Film, Trauma
and Change Reinhart Lutz
- Transformations of Trauma without Rehabilitating Failure: The Dual
Attempt at Reshaping America’s Memory of the War in Viet Nam in
Mel Gibson’s We Were Soldiers (2002) We Were Soldiers (2002) seeks to recover, for commercial
mass audience entertainment purposes, a part of the American historical
experience which has caused deep traumatic fissures in American society
and has often been considered an emblematic American failure. Through
its carefully selected and produced slice of history, the film relies
on a sufficient recuperative transformation of cultural attitudes among
its domestic audience, and seeks to accelerate and help shape this process.
It aims to re-valorize select aspects of its historical subject at a
precise historical moment, shaped by cinematic, cultural and political
developments, which is deemed advantageous. Yet the film also seeks
to acknowledge the overall historical failure of America, with its parallel
massive disruption of civic consensus and political order. It tries
to avoid critical dismissal by refusing to project a monolithic message
too directly at odds with a still lingering, if slowly receding, negative
collective memory and the factual outcome. Hanh
Nguyen - Capturing Changes in a Changed Land: Tony Bui’s
Three Seasons and Images of Transformation in Post-War Vietnam Tony Bui’s Three Seasons (1999) is a remarkable
film, itself the product of changing political and economic attitudes
in a changing country. The film seeks, with uncanny clarity, to kaleidoscopically
capture some of the ruptures and temporary results of the transformations
triggered by the new economic and political policies of the Socialist
Republic of Viet Nam in the aftermath of the mid-1980’s articulation
of doi moi, a strategic blueprint for bringing economic change
to a society previously committed to the global application of Socialist
ideology, while maintaining the near-exclusive hold on political power
by the country’s Communist Party, Ðang Cong San. The film
is analyzed as a material cultural document which exhibits the consequences
of transformations in both Viet Nam and in the attitudes of a hegemonic
United States in its relationship to the “Other,” with whom
it has long generated an often traumatic relationship.
|
|