Download Style
Sheet 1
Download Style
Sheet 2

 

Session 10: Film, Trauma and Change
Chair: Joss Hands

Reinhart Lutz - Transformations of Trauma without Rehabilitating Failure: The Dual Attempt at Reshaping America’s Memory of the War in Viet Nam in Mel Gibson’s We Were Soldiers (2002)
Department of English and Film Studies, University of the Pacific, Stockton, CA 95204, USA.

We Were Soldiers (2002) seeks to recover, for commercial mass audience entertainment purposes, a part of the American historical experience which has caused deep traumatic fissures in American society and has often been considered an emblematic American failure. Through its carefully selected and produced slice of history, the film relies on a sufficient recuperative transformation of cultural attitudes among its domestic audience, and seeks to accelerate and help shape this process. It aims to re-valorize select aspects of its historical subject at a precise historical moment, shaped by cinematic, cultural and political developments, which is deemed advantageous. Yet the film also seeks to acknowledge the overall historical failure of America, with its parallel massive disruption of civic consensus and political order. It tries to avoid critical dismissal by refusing to project a monolithic message too directly at odds with a still lingering, if slowly receding, negative collective memory and the factual outcome.
To achieve its dual ambition of a recuperative and partially sustentative transformation of its subject, the film chooses an event set at the relatively pre-traumatic onset of the conflict, in November 1965. It confines itself almost exclusively to the military war at a time when North Viet Nam’s strategists were somewhat obliging this American desire. The film builds on a re-valorization of battle, utilizing visual and sonic aesthetics which Saving Private Ryan established for the genre. Yet it is careful to allow for some degree of alterity and divergence. It opens to a flashback of French soldiers, expressing with “pays merde, guerre merde” a common subsequent American sentiment. At rather minimal levels still surpassing previous generic norms, screen time is given to the side of the “Other,” ironically played by Vietnamese-Americans from California, where the film was shot. Graphically, with a heap of North Vietnamese war dead reclaimed after American departure from the battlefield, the movie introduces a note of dissonance reinforced by a North Vietnamese officer’s statement that this early success will only lead the Americans into a deeper tragedy. Thus, the film reflects the most current transformation of America’s collective memory of a traumatic war experience.


Hanh Nguyen - Capturing Changes in a Changed Land: Tony Bui’s Three Seasons and Images of Transformation in Post-War Vietnam
University of California, Riverside, Department of English, Riverside, CA 92521, USA

Tony Bui’s Three Seasons (1999) is a remarkable film, itself the product of changing political and economic attitudes in a changing country. The film seeks, with uncanny clarity, to kaleidoscopically capture some of the ruptures and temporary results of the transformations triggered by the new economic and political policies of the Socialist Republic of Viet Nam in the aftermath of the mid-1980’s articulation of doi moi, a strategic blueprint for bringing economic change to a society previously committed to the global application of Socialist ideology, while maintaining the near-exclusive hold on political power by the country’s Communist Party, Ðang Cong San. The film is analyzed as a material cultural document which exhibits the consequences of transformations in both Viet Nam and in the attitudes of a hegemonic United States in its relationship to the “Other,” with whom it has long generated an often traumatic relationship.
Findings discussed are the factors which enabled Bui and his Vietnamese-American and European-American talent and crew (including his sister, Zoe Bui, and Harvey Keitel) shooting the film on location in Viet Nam, indicating a sea change in both Vietnamese-US relations and those of the local Vietnamese and visiting overseas “Viet Kieu,” the members of the post-war diaspora whom the West has often called the “boat people.” Next, focus is on the transformations in Vietnamese society captured by the film: the effects of an easing of Socialist hegemony and the concomitant rush into early Capitalism, ironically reminiscent of the very labor and class situations encountered by Karl Marx in the mid- to late 1800’s Great Britain; massive exploitation of labor and open re-emergence of prostitution and the lumpenproletariat, and the curious side story of a European-American father’s quest for his Eurasian daughter (a figure of some problematic cultural consequence in the country of her birth, indicative of an intra-societal institutionally, culturally and politically sanctioned racism).